August to October 2025, from $137K in Google and Microsoft spend.
GTM engineering: one system for ICP, enrichment, outreach and attribution
It holds your ICP definition, spots the accounts warming up, verifies the committee and drafts against the real signal.
A person approves every send.
What a four-tool GTM stack actually costs
The fees are the small part. The drift is the expensive part.
The stack
Enrichment, list building, sequencing and LinkedIn, each with a fee and its own idea of your ICP.
The consequence
A current customer gets a prospecting email. An open deal gets retargeted as cold.
The missing number
Nobody can say what share of the ICP has been reached, because no single system knows.
The GTM engine we build, in six parts
Six parts, in this order. Each one feeds the next.
ICP definition
Firmographics, technographics and closed-won history, in one list every channel reads.
Signal
Accounts warming up on your ads and site, before anyone would have spotted them.
Suppression
Customers and open deals removed daily, before a message is drafted.
Committee and contact
The buying committee identified and contact details verified.
Approved send
Drafts reference the real signal. A person approves each one.
Write-back
Penetration and pipeline go back to HubSpot or Salesforce.
Running on MicksonBrain™
It reads the same attribution and ICP definition as everything else we run, and every change to a live account waits for a person to approve it.
Find it
ABM targeting and ICP penetration for B2B programs.
Act on it
Account changes need human approval, with one-click rollback.
Tool stack versus GTM engine, side by side
What changes when one engine replaces the stack.
Clay plus four tools
- Platform fees, $10K+ a year before seats
- ICP definition maintained separately in each tool
- Manual suppression uploads, usually stale
- Sequences run unattended by default
- Open and reply rates, per tool
GTM agent on MicksonBrain™
- Compute cost, roughly $500 a month in practice
- One ICP definition, shared by paid and outbound
- Suppression daily, before a message is drafted
- A person approves every send
- ICP penetration and pipeline, written back to the CRM
B2B results, named and by funding stage
Every figure carries the period it covers.
More from the portfolio
440 conversions against 149, on 15% less spend.
Read the storyConversion rate 5.4% to 19.5%, on 34% less spend.
Read the story302 MQLs in a quarter, half of them accepted by sales.
Read the storyHow these are measured. Named cards carry the period each figure covers, taken from the account itself or the client's own CRM. The anonymous cards below them are Google Ads conversions as reported, same quarter year over year where history allows, otherwise first full quarter vs Q3 2026. The full method note.
Questions about GTM engineering
What does GTM engineering mean here?
Building the machinery that finds, qualifies and reaches your ICP instead of renting four tools that each do a slice of it.
How does the cost compare with Clay and a sequencer?
The agent runs on MicksonBrain™ at compute cost, roughly $500 a month against $10K or more a year in platform fees. The bigger saving is not maintaining the ICP definition in four places.
Do you replace our SDRs?
No. The agent does the part SDRs do worst at scale: finding the signal and drafting against it. A person approves every send. If the plan is to remove the humans, we are the wrong firm.
What about deliverability?
Volume is capped, sends are approved individually, and suppression runs before a message is drafted. We would rather send less and keep the domain.
See the agent against your ICP
Bring your ICP definition and we will show you what the engine finds in it.
For home services from $5M, PE-backed platforms, and B2B teams with a real ICP. If that is not you yet, we will say so.
- Thirty minutes with Drew, not a sales rep.
- We open your live accounts and your CRM.
- You leave with the first two or three things we would change.
- No long contracts. You own the accounts and the data.